Vogue 1078: *sigh* unutterably gorgeous. Masses of almost Fortuny -like pleating and presented in a flattering colour – If I was a size 16 I would sooooooo find an occasion to make this dress. (A bit much for popping down to the shops, yes?)
Vogue 1079 – oh my eyes! They BURN!! Too much lamé is – well – TOO MUCH! I can see this dress working beautifully in silk charmeuse, but as it is ? The horror, the horror! (and yes, her bum DOES look big in that!)
Vogue 1082 - a new skirt from Sandra Betzina. I’ve seen similar skirts (Butterick4859, Burda 7995 ) but I know that Sandra’s patterns fit me and her instructions are generally much better than the average. One I’ll definitely be buying.
Vogue 1073 – another challenge from Chado Ralph Rucci – I can’t decided if this is genius or madness! All those teeny shaped pintucks – almost looks like you’ve gone a coupla rounds with Edward Scissorhands – but it could look awesome.
But my two THREE “I could really use that patttern” picks: a new basic tshirt with lovely shaping and variations, Vogue 8536
and the dress that seems to be the bloggists pick so far – Vogue 8532 - which, as Erica pointed out went from “yeah maybe” to “MUST HAVE” as soon as I saw it on a real person (well, a model!) Love the sleeves, love the bodice, love the fit – it’s just gorgeous!
And now that the correct line drawing is up – this, oh, this!! Sue, we’re going to find a hat to go with this a do the races! I can see this in an embroidered silk, understated and elegant.
So – what are YOUR Picks and Pans? What do you think of my choices?
Related posts:
Tags: Other Sewing Projects, Vanity
-
Ewwww, that lame dress is awful. Like a really, really bad sci-fi costume. I feel sorry for the person that had to sew the sample. But I do like that 8532.
And thanks for the comment on my blouse! I actually ended up changing it further as of last night– there was no way I could get the lacing tight enough to fit my arms where it was, and after taking the ruffle off to fix it, I ended up leaving it off and doing elastic further up the arms instead, like one of the other views.
Comments are now closed.









4 comments